Healing Environments vs Hospitable Environments: What is the difference?
Saturday, June 25th, 2005When we first began working in this field in the late 80’s, the term “healing environment” was hardly mainstream. It was not being used by most hospitals, nor was it a benchmark, a marketing hook, or a standard. It was simply too new a concept and the design and construction industries were just beginning to work from a new reality that a ‘healing’ environment played a proactive role in improving patient outcomes. Now, 2005, evidence-based design based on research and documentation supports not only the theory that the environment is itself a caregiver, but that it can be a contributing risk factor hidden among other factors that threaten safety and treatment efficacy.
Among the many questions that we are asked has to do with how a hospital committee can be certain that a design professional or architect is qualified to design and implement a healing environment and what outcomes can be expected.
I could say check references and background. However, this may not actually reveal what one would hope. Not every hospital sets facility design and construction on the basis of therapeutic outcomes. Sometimes the bottom-line is limited to functionality, appearance, and budget. In fact, I might suggest that this is most of the time…except for the most cutting-edge organizations.
When I look at the many new hospitals and clinics under construction and what we now know about the impact of color, noise, lighting, way finding, spatial organization, traffic flow…and the demand for less medication, improved rest, privacy, efficiency, and accuracy…it is difficult to understand how a facility could consider one side of this equation without accountability to the other: functionality + clinical effectiveness, or the reverse.
I am interested in your experiences in conceptualizing environmental changes for your hospital or clinic. Is the goal a healing environment? If not, what are the objectives that determine the outcome?


